Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa was buried at Chennai’s Marina beach with state honours on Tuesday, as a million weeping mourners paid an emotional farewell to the former movie star who enjoyed almost god-like status among admirers. Jayalalithaa’s body, draped in her. Late Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa was laid to rest next to her A practicing Iyengar in her private life, Jayalalithaa was buried near. CHENNAI: The big question that lingered on everyone's minds over J Jayalalithaa's final rites was why she was buried, deviating from the.
HIGHLIGHTSответили why is jayalalitha buried что смогуBury Jayalalithaa on Chennai's Beach – and Then Bury the Rule of Law With Her
The burial sites of two of Tamil Nadu's former chief ministers do not feature in the list of approved sites published by the Chennai Corporation. Jayalalithaa was laid to rest, adjacent to the MGR memorial, in Chennai. Credit: PTI. Chennai : On December 6, , the late chief minister J. Jayalalithaa was buried in a vault near where her mentor and former chief minister M.
Ramachandran a. MGR lay buried. In less than a week, the Government of Tamil Nadu announced that it would spend Rs 15 crore on a memorial for the departed leader within the existing MGR memorial. Both acts — the completed burial and the proposed memorial — are illegal. However, far from being a subterfuge act befitting an illegality, the burial and the funeral that preceded it were witnessed by a long list of dignitaries: the prime minister, chief ministers of several states, the governor of Tamil Nadu, the chief justice of Madras High Court and other judges.
The funeral procession and the burial itself were conducted by the three wings of the armed forces. The police too were present in the thousands to enforce the law at this ceremony, a ceremony of dubious legal standing. Any democracy hinges on the rule of law and equality of all in the eyes of law. Both, in fact, open several cans of troublesome worms. It would be an understatement to say that Jayalalithaa has had a rough life.
She deserves as good a rest as any. The legally fraught burial and the grand structures planned at the site are bound to draw avoidable controversy and disturb her peace. Many questions will be asked — of that one can be certain. If the illegality of the burial is to be ignored out of respect for the dead, it is important that no further controversy is drawn to the site.
However, O. Why then did the Government of Tamil Nadu choose the fraught path of bucking the laws? By choosing this path, what signal is the government sending to the people about its respect for the rule of law? If the Tamil Nadu government can flip a finger to the laws of the land, does that mean others can, too? The construction of permanent structures on the beach is prohibited by the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, Only the demolition and reconstruction of certain kinds of buildings are permissible.
In any case, even permissible activities are regulated and require prior environmental clearance based on a host of documents and plans that are to be submitted by the project proponent. The local building rules and city masterplan too may pose a stumbling block. Does this mean the government will be barred from going ahead with the construction?
Absolutely not. It is only laws that impede the will of violators, not the law-enforcers. The Tamil Nadu State Coastal Zone Management Authority, the Corporation of Chennai and the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority are pliant regulators with no recorded history of cracking the whip on elite violators or of insisting on the law for powerful applicants.
The Corporation of Chennai, for instance, is meant to enforce laws concerning burial, cremation or disposal of the dead by any other means. Section 1 of the Act sets out the process of licensing. Section 2 and 3 require the posting of a conspicuously visible sign near the entrance to the burial ground and publishing of a register of all approved burial places by the corporation. It is a possibility that the owner of the site has applied for and secured a license for a burial ground at that site, and that the corporation has been remiss in publishing that information.
But if that is the case, one would be curious to see if this burial space is an exclusive space. If not, is it open to any dead person that wants to be buried near the beach? If a memorial is allowed for one VIP, there can be no reason why beach-space should be denied to other VIPs, or for that matter to anybody. Actually, there can then be no justifiable reason why people should not bury their loved ones in public spaces of their choice.